She said she was angry. It caught my attention.
We all introduced ourselves at the first meeting of the Advisory Committee on Affordable Housing. When my turn came, I shared my housing related experiences briefly and a few other small details. Many participants started with where they were from, work-wise: they represented local agencies and groups or committees, others came from council chambers and the other different City management areas that are usually included in such planning and strategizing. When Councillor Chapman said she was in the room, having come there because she was angry, I felt that.
We have a housing CRISIS here in the region. We’ve talked for years about its ongoing increase and what to do about it, but always the people who were talking had a lot of privilege: those in the discussion knew they have a home to return to for their evenings sleep and self-care. As much as I felt the same anger as Councillor Chapman in the words of some others, I also felt the privilege in the room, my own included.
post some such links over the next while for your reading and consideration as well. (There are always many interesting figures that can be applied and viewed in any statistical analysis. Numbers amuse me! But I digress…)
We need to be finding the funding to support projects to reduce the poverty figures within our area. And now.
Nothing in the materials I was given at that meeting even touch on income of those who are lowest in our community’s demographics. Even when broadened to include the complete scope of those in the lowest tax bracket, the numbers for initial review as offered at the Affordable Housing Strategy Committee meeting began at 60,000$, sitting far above such, and nowhere near what a person in poverty earns. That amount is more than I have ever earned myself at almost 40 years old, and most definitely more than the income of those who rely on our social services systems and need a place to live.
Though I realize that we are awaiting the pending Housing Assessment, due to be released shortly and relayed for review then, I feel I must side with those who must already feel left out. I also have no doubt that figures offering more immediate clarity are already available for review, in some fashion, or could have been acquired with the same relative ease as those I was given. More figures that reflect those who earn far less than 60,000$, that is people on social assistance and living in poverty.
Politics, profits, and all the many
stigmas that we hold within our community need to be dropped in
these rooms and discussions
Decisions made by those with privilege, without adequately listening to the voices of those with none, will fail to make any necessary change within our society, at its most base structural level, away from the belief that one’s income has a direct correlation to of the value of an individual. Politics, profits, and all the many stigmas that we hold within our community need to be dropped in these rooms and discussions if we are actually looking to get anywhere on the most core and pressing issues literally placing some of our citizens at risk of death, due to weather, if nothing else.
I want to see our hearts. I want to see us putting more and immediate focus on those who are relying on these talks with their lives. They won’t be having a Christmas holiday to attend to, beyond the offerings of our local supports (THANK YOU FOR THESE!), more so still just maintaining their personal survival.
Sign and Share the
Petition: Care & Precautions for Unsheltered NOW
Regan Sunshine Brussé
I am often wrong and always learning.